Three
letters stand for the revolution in the design offices of Formula 1: CFD -
the abbreviation for Computational Fluid Dynamics. With the help of this
magic formula, the engineers can simulate the aerodynamic effects of a
vehicle part even before it has been built. That saves time and money.
There is no question about it, CFD has permanently transformed the
development processes in Formula 1. For example, while searching for the
optimal front wing several years ago, the engineers withdrew to the wind
tunnel with various different design ideas, and discovered that only one of
the 10 tested versions was really good. A great deal of time and money had
been invested in the construction of those other nine wings, and they all
ended up on the scrap heap. Nowadays, thanks to CFD, those wings would never
even be built.
"Today, we know beforehand which parts will really be worth testing in the
wind tunnel," said Naethan Eagles, Senior CFD Aerodynamicist at WilliamsF1,
before the Italian Grand Prix. "That has halved our development cycle." |
|
When building a
Formula 1 car, the engineers concentrate primarily on aerodynamic
efficiency. Good aerodynamics is the most important performance criterion in
Formula 1: it is the easiest way for a team to gain an advantage over its
rivals. CFD is an invaluable help in the search for the best compromise
between as much downforce as possible and as little air resistance as
possible. The HP computer makes the airflows surrounding the vehicle
visible, and at the same time shows the effects of individual vehicle parts
on each other and on the aerodynamics. This representation therefore also
shows the engineers where they are generating, and where they are losing,
downforce. And, if they wish, they can immediately adapt their virtual model
on the computer according to their new findings.
In many cases, there is a lack of time for extensive testing of new parts
because of the high development pressure in Formula 1. That is why realistic
and meaningful computer simulations are an invaluable help for the
engineers. Even at an early stage in the development, they set the course
for the cars' good performance on the race track. Even so, these simulations
are only possible with the help of enormous quantities of data. The
WilliamsF1 engineers are able to call on an HP super-computer similar to the
one that scientists used to decode human DNA. The
following figures show just how much they exploit this unique possibility:
in the 2001 season, a data volume of 250 gigabytes flowed at WilliamsF1
during the development of the race car; in 2002, that increased to 800; and
in 2003 the figure reached an almost inconceivable 4,000 gigabytes.
Through using CFD, WilliamsF1 has a major advantage over its rivals: while
all the other teams can only test individual parts separately from each
other, but not the entire vehicle, the capacity of the supercomputer allows
the WilliamsF1 engineers to simulate all of the airflows acting on the
vehicle at the same time. This turns the computer into a sort of virtual
wind tunnel, because it means that aerodynamic elements can be tested even
before they are actually produced.
Thanks to the constantly increasing power of the supercomputers, the
engineers' work with CFD is also becoming more and more realistic in series
production. The programs have long since been used for optimising all the
important flow processes, and not just in the field of aerodynamics.
"We simulate the throughput and the deposit behaviour in soot filters and
also the fuel flow in the injection process," said Dr Christoph Lauterwasser
from the Allianz Centre for Technology. "So the CFD methodology contributes
to the efficient use of the fuels and the reduction of pollutant emissions."
In spite of the triumphant march of CFD into Formula 1 design offices, the
real wind tunnels are certainly not becoming superfluous. On the contrary,
the systems complement each other beautifully. The wind tunnel is still
absolutely indispensable, even just for checking the computer simulations
for their viability in everyday use. It is only with the tunnel's technical
possibilities that the engineers can simulate various racing situations at
the touch of a button, such as driving over kerbs or hard braking, for
instance. A task that would take 30 minutes in the wind tunnel would often
take hours on the computer, because of the enormous data volumes involved.
So each of the systems has its own strengths.
"In the wind tunnel, you can find out how something works," explained
Naethan Eagles, "but not why it works better. Only the computer can show you
that." |