Formula
1’s X-ray vision: together with his team, Jo Bauer, Technical Delegate of
the Federation Internationale de l’Automobile (FIA), inspects the cars
before each race. He makes sure that everything is done by the book and that
the safety regulations are observed. At the United States Grand Prix, the
same applies as everywhere else: confidence is good, certainty is better.
The work-packed weekend of the man who surveys Formula 1 with an eagle’s eye
begins on the Thursday before the race. The area devoted to the Technical
Delegates is action-packed all day, as every team has brought along two race
cars and a spare car. That adds up to 30 cars which are measured, weighed
and closely scrutinised for six hours. Here, grams and millimetres count.
This first inspection only rarely turns up any great irregularities because
the teams have done their homework and have already checked the cars back at
home in the factory. For a good reason. “The race cars are constructed at
the very limit, and over the course of a season new parts are added
continuously. If we inspect them beforehand ourselves, we avoid any nasty
surprises at the race track,” Sam Michael, Technical Director of the BMW
WilliamsF1 Team, points out. |
|
All clear,
Commissioner? The FIA makes a great effort to ensure that the stipulations
of the Technical Regulations are adhered to. For example, each car is
assigned its own scrutineer for the entire race weekend. Only those cars
that are identified as conforming to the regulations during Thursday's basic
inspection are allowed to take part in the first practice session on Friday.
On this second day, Jo Bauer and his colleagues content themselves with
random checks, simply waving some of the cars into the FIA area. Sometimes
the ground clearance is examined, sometimes the front-wheel area is checked
and some-times the width of the rear wing is measured. Over the course of
the race weekend, fuel samples are taken again and again, and are
immediately analysed in an FIA laboratory located outside of the racing
circuit. If the sample does not correspond to the template submitted to the
FIA before the season, a summons is issued to the respective team.
As the race approaches, the inspections increase in intensity. Again, the
Technical Commissioners examine random cars, measuring and weighing them.
This can quite easily lead to a single vehicle being checked several times.
On the Sunday of the race, the scrutineers not only take another batch of
fuel samples
but also inspect the brake discs and, for example, the bearing surface of
the tyres. The final checks take place during the formation of the starting
grid.
After the race, a weighing ceremony is conducted during which the drivers,
dressed in their full work outfit, are required to join their vehicles on
the scales. In addition, a certain number of randomly determined cars are
inspected more closely – right down to the electronic programs of the
on-board computers. As with the fuel, a copy of the software is also
submitted to the FIA. This copy is now compared to the programs used during
the race. Sometimes, Jo Bauer and his team work well into the night. It is
not until all the checks have been completed – and no competitor has
protested against another team – that the race result becomes official. If
the scrutineers discover a violation of the regulations, they inform the
Race Commission and the Sport Commissioners, who then make an on-the-spot
decision regarding the penalty that should be imposed upon the team in
question.
Although the inspections at the race track are already highly intense, the
FIA is discussing a change to the technical approval after the race. FIA
President Max Mosley has been thinking about how grey areas in the
regulations can be eliminated with clearer formulations and how violations
can be detected even more effectively – and not only since the San Marino
Grand Prix, where a prohibited auxiliary fuel tank was found in one of the
vehicles. One possibility is to select one of the eight cars that made it
into the points after every race and totally dismantle it. The probability
of uncovering a violation of the rules would this way become even higher.
“The chances of being caught would always be seven to one,” Max Mosley
calculates. However, he makes no secret of the disadvantages of such a
regulation, either: “It would take a great deal of time and there would be a
long lapse before the race results were official.”
In any case, there will still be lots of work for Jo Bauer and his team in
the future.
And did you know...
... that the engineers in Formula 1 have always come up with unusual ideas
to bypass the regulations? Take a look at these three examples: in 1978,
Brabham installed a propeller on the rear of its BT46 to increase downforce.
In 1980, Lotus developed a twin chassis that reduced the negative impact on
aerodynamics caused by the vibrations of the rigid suspension. In 1981,
Nelson Piquet used a smaller fuel tank during qualifying to reduce weight. A
rear wing, hastily fitted before the inspection, brought the car back up to
the required minimum weight. That year, the Brazilian became World Champion. |